Anbernic RG556 vs Retroid Pocket 3 Plus
The Anbernic RG556 (~$250) and Retroid Pocket 3 Plus (~$150) are closely matched Android handhelds. The right pick comes down to display, battery, and form factor — not raw performance.
- Retroid Pocket 3 Plus costs $100 less (~$250 vs ~$150) — roughly 40% cheaper than the Anbernic RG556.
- Processor: Anbernic RG556 runs a Unisoc T820 vs Unisoc Tiger T618 (Mali-G52 MC2) in the Retroid Pocket 3 Plus.
- RAM: 8GB LPDDR4x vs 4GB LPDDR4x — Anbernic RG556 has the memory advantage for multitasking and heavier emulators.
- Battery: 5,500mAh vs 4,500mAh — Anbernic RG556 lasts longer between charges.
- Display: Anbernic RG556 has an OLED/AMOLED panel (5.48" AMOLED 1920x1080) vs the Retroid Pocket 3 Plus's 4.7" IPS 750x1334 touchscreen — better contrast and black levels.
- Weight: ~340g vs ~230g — Retroid Pocket 3 Plus is more pocketable.
Specs comparison
Side-by-side technical details. The glowing value wins its row.
| Spec | Anbernic RG556 | Retroid Pocket 3 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$250 | ~$150(best) |
| Display | 5.48" AMOLED 1920x1080(best) | 4.7" IPS 750x1334 touchscreen |
| Processor | Unisoc T820 | Unisoc Tiger T618 (Mali-G52 MC2) |
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4x(best) | 4GB LPDDR4x |
| Storage | 128GB + microSD | 128GB eMMC + microSD |
| Battery | 5,500mAh(best) | 4,500mAh |
| Weight | ~340g | ~230g(best) |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 |
Portability
Retroid Pocket 3 Plus winsAnbernic RG556 is best for
- Large screen for emulation
- Good middle-ground performance
- Hall effect sticks for longevity
Retroid Pocket 3 Plus is best for
- First Android handheld purchase
- PS1/N64/DC gaming on budget
- Touchscreen Android games
Anbernic RG556 watch outs
- Processor is mid-range
- Some demanding games may struggle
- Less community support than Retroid
Retroid Pocket 3 Plus watch outs
- T618 shows age on demanding PS2 games
- eMMC storage slower than UFS
- Basic model only 4GB RAM
Retroid Pocket 3 Plus wins on value. You give up little in benchmarks but save $100 vs the Anbernic RG556.
Winner: Retroid Pocket 3 PlusStill unsure?
Let our picker quiz find your perfect handheld in 60 seconds.
Anbernic RG556 vs Retroid Pocket 3 Plus FAQ
Which is better, the Anbernic RG556 or the Retroid Pocket 3 Plus?
Retroid Pocket 3 Plus wins on value. You give up little in benchmarks but save $100 vs the Anbernic RG556.
What is the price difference between the Anbernic RG556 and the Retroid Pocket 3 Plus?
The Retroid Pocket 3 Plus costs $149 while the Anbernic RG556 is $249 — a $100 difference. Retroid Pocket 3 Plus is the value pick; Anbernic RG556 justifies the premium with 5.48" amoled.
Which has better performance, the Anbernic RG556 or Retroid Pocket 3 Plus?
The Retroid Pocket 3 Plus scores higher across aggregated performance metrics, powered by a Unisoc Tiger T618 (Mali-G52 MC2) chip with 4GB LPDDR4x RAM. The Anbernic RG556 uses a Unisoc T820 and still handles most emulation workloads competently.
How does battery life compare between the Anbernic RG556 and Retroid Pocket 3 Plus?
The Anbernic RG556 ships with a 5,500mAh battery. The Retroid Pocket 3 Plus has a 4,500mAh. Real-world runtime depends on workload: retro emulation typically gets double the runtime of native Android or PS2 emulation.
Which is more portable, the Anbernic RG556 or Retroid Pocket 3 Plus?
The Anbernic RG556 weighs ~340g, while the Retroid Pocket 3 Plus weighs ~230g. Lighter devices are easier for pocket carry and long sessions but often tradeoff battery capacity or grip comfort.
Should I buy the Anbernic RG556 or wait for the Retroid Pocket 3 Plus?
Both are currently in market. If your use case fits large screen for emulation, the Anbernic RG556 delivers today. If you prioritize first android handheld purchase, the Retroid Pocket 3 Plus is the stronger long-term pick. Neither is about to be replaced — both vendors have 12+ month refresh cycles.